Marco Rubio Leaves Situation Room - Stuns World with 3 Word Announcement

NUCLEAR THREAT NEUTRALIZED: RUBIO UNLEASHES ‘EPIC FURY’ TO PERMANENTLY INCINERATE IRANIAN NUCLEAR AMBITIONS
WASHINGTON, D.C. — APRIL 24, 2026 — The 2026 Restoration has reached its defining moment of global security as the 47th President executes a clinical termination of the Iranian nuclear threat. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, emerging from the Situation Room with a visceral message for the world, announced that recent U.S. strikes were a surgical success, designed to permanently wipe out Tehran’s hidden mountain facilities. In the 2026 Renaissance, where Administrative Lethality is the standard for national defense, Rubio declared that the mission to prevent a "Nuclear Mullah" regime was a priority from "day one."
Speaking on Hannity, Rubio revealed that Iran was aiming to become the "next North Korea," developing a stockpile of missiles capable of reaching the continental United States. However, the 119th Congress and the Trump administration have moved at Wartime Speed to dismantle this "Machine of Disruption." Rubio noted that the rogue regime is now at its weakest point in 25 years, while the Victorious American spirit is at its strongest.
While the 47th President remains open to direct talks, he has made it clear that "fake negotiations" used as a delay tactic will no longer be tolerated by a sovereign America.
I. NATO IN THE CROSSHAIRS: AUDITING THE MUSEUM OF STAGNATION
The mission also served as a "Smoking Gun" for the state of our alliances. Rubio issued a clinical rebuke to European allies—specifically Spain and France—who denied the U.S. access to airspace and bases during the strike. In the 2026 Restoration, we recognize that an alliance that hinders American security is a relic of the "Museum of Stagnation." Rubio suggested a total re-examination of NATO, questioning the benefit of engagement with nations that prioritize "schizophrenic" diplomacy over the security of the West.
"If that’s the arrangement, that’s a hard one to stay engaged in," Rubio stated. "The U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore if you won't fight for yourselves."
II. THE DIEGO GARCIA BREAKTHROUGH: ADMINISTRATIVE LETHALITY AT WORK
Despite initial hesitation from the United Kingdom, the Trump administration successfully secured the use of the joint U.S.-UK base at Diego Garcia. This staging point proved essential for the Wartime Speed execution of Operation Epic Fury, striking 2,000 targets and degrading the "Passport Pipeline" of terror. The final verdict is clear: The era of American "cowardice" in foreign policy is over. Under the 47th President, we are reclaiming our role as the Force of Good by ensuring we are Rich, Safe, and Independent.
Supreme Court Deals Crushing Blow To California’s EV Mandate

The U.S. Supreme Court just handed a major defeat to California’s climate radicals, and even one liberal justice joined the conservative wing to make it happen. In a 7-2 ruling, the court cleared the way for the state’s energy producers to move forward with their lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, targeting California’s extreme green energy mandates.
At the heart of the case is the state’s requirement that electric vehicles dominate the market by 2035, part of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to force California into “carbon neutrality.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, made it clear these mandates are not just heavy-handed but potentially illegal.
“The government generally may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders,” Kavanaugh wrote. “In light of this Court’s precedents and the evidence before the Court of Appeals, the fuel producers established Article III standing to challenge EPA’s approval of the California regulations.”
Kavanaugh also pointed out that the EPA has shifted its own legal arguments over time, a fact that did not help its case.
“EPA has repeatedly altered its legal position on whether the Clean Air Act authorizes California regulations targeting greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles,” he noted.
This ruling comes on the heels of President Donald Trump’s decisive action earlier this month, when he signed three resolutions wiping out key parts of California’s aggressive green agenda. The Trump administration’s move was a massive blow to Newsom, a likely 2028 presidential contender, and his push to transform California into the most “progressive” climate state in the country.
“This case involves California’s 2012 request for EPA approval of new California regulations,” Kavanaugh explained. “As relevant here, those regulations generally require automakers (i) to limit average greenhouse gas emissions across their fleets of new motor vehicles sold in the State and (ii) to manufacture a certain percentage of electric vehicles as part of their vehicle fleets.”
Environmental Protection Agency head Lee Zeldin revealed this week that President Donald Trump is about to make “the largest act of deregulation in the history of the United States.”
When Trump’s EPA ends a 2009 finding that greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide are bad for people’s health, it will stop 16 years of federal efforts to force big changes in American life without any legal reason.
The Endangerment Finding led to a lot of rules that are thought to cost more than a trillion dollars.
Former President Barack Obama tried to get Congress to pass a big climate change law early in his time in office. When the bill got stuck, Obama took action on his own.
The Clean Air Act should cover greenhouse gases, according to the EPA’s Endangerment Finding from December 2009. But that law was never meant to do that. It was passed 40 years ago, before global warming was even a topic of discussion.
The Clean Air Act was meant to control a few pollutants that were bad for people’s health right away, like smoke from factories or exhaust from cars.
In contrast, almost everything, everywhere, releases greenhouse gases, even people when they breathe.
There was and is no clear and legal way to regulate them under the law, leading to years of uncertainty and court challenges.
The Endangerment Finding had the biggest impact on cars.
The Biden administration used it to make almost all new cars and trucks electric by 2032. This is a huge and very costly project.
The Endangerment Finding lets the EPA change one of the country’s biggest industries in ten years, even though the American people never voted for it.
The EPA said that the new EV rules would save businesses and families money over time because they wouldn’t have to spend as much on gas.
But like most rules about energy efficiency, it never said why the government had to step in and make something so good happen.
Many truckers and families would have trouble spending thousands of extra dollars on electric vehicles, but President Joe Biden’s EPA didn’t listen to their concerns.
Trump’s team says that getting rid of the finding will save almost $2,500 for each car.
Spencer Pratt SURGES POSTING VIRAL LA Animal Ad And THIS Happens As He NOW Leads Over Karen Bass FULL STORY: In a surprising twist in the Los Angeles mayoral race, reality TV star Spencer Pratt has surged ahead in the polls, challenging incumbent Mayor Karen Bass. As the election approaches, Pratt's campaign has gained momentum, resonating with voters through a viral animal welfare advertisement that highlights the plight of neglected animals in the city. This ad has sparked discussions about Bass's handling of the animal shelter crisis and homelessness in Los Angeles. With only days left until the election, Pratt's message is clear: he aims to bring about significant change by addressing these pressing issues. Meanwhile, Bass continues her campaign efforts, facing increasing pressure as the race tightens. The dynamics of this election have captured national attention, raising questions about celebrity influence in politics and the future of Los Angeles. - Trends.newsonline.biz
Spencer Pratt SURGES POSTING VIRAL LA Animal Ad And THIS Happens As He NOW Leads Over Karen Bass
In an unprecedented turn of events, the Los Angeles mayoral race has taken a dramatic twist as reality television star Spencer Pratt emerges as a serious contender against the incumbent mayor, Karen Bass.
The campaign has gained national attention, with Pratt wrapping up a media tour in New York City that has propelled him into the spotlight.
As the election date draws near, the race has become increasingly competitive, with recent polls indicating a neck-and-neck battle between Pratt and Bass.
Matt Finn, reporting from Los Angeles, highlights the tense atmosphere as both candidates ramp up their efforts to secure votes.
Karen Bass, the Democratic incumbent, has been actively campaigning, holding rallies and events to galvanize her supporters.

At a recent rally at the SEIU Union Building, Bass addressed her opponents, including Pratt, whom she referred to as a “TV reality star villain.”
Her remarks drew laughter from the crowd as she emphasized the importance of choosing a leader who truly cares for the community rather than a celebrity figure.
Bass’s campaign is focused on her experience and commitment to addressing the pressing issues facing Los Angeles, including homelessness and public safety.
However, Pratt’s campaign is gaining traction as he appeals directly to mothers and animal lovers, positioning himself as a candidate who will prioritize the needs of families and pets.
In a recent interview with Fox News, Pratt stated, “Moms are getting me elected because I’m saying, ‘Oh, as mayor, I’m going to enforce the law and make sure moms and kids can use their parks again.’”
He emphasized the need to combat illegal encampments and restore safety in neighborhoods, presenting himself as a candidate of change.

Pratt’s message resonates with voters who are frustrated with the current state of affairs in Los Angeles, particularly regarding homelessness and animal welfare.
His campaign has gained momentum thanks to a viral advertisement that highlights the plight of animals in the city’s shelters and on the streets, particularly in areas like Skid Row.
In the ad, Pratt draws a parallel between the unconditional love of dogs and the need for compassion towards all living beings, stating, “There’s a reason dog is just God backwards.”
He criticizes Bass for neglecting the animal crisis and vows to put an end to the suffering of animals in the city.
The advertisement has garnered significant attention on social media, with many praising Pratt for bringing attention to the issue of animal welfare.
As the polls tighten, Pratt’s campaign is reportedly outpacing Bass in fundraising, raising concerns for the incumbent as she intensifies her efforts to rally support.

Bass has been seen actively soliciting votes, providing instructions on how to vote and encouraging constituents to participate in the electoral process.
Amid the heightened competition, Pratt’s campaign continues to gain traction, with reports indicating that he has surpassed Bass in some polls, leading to a surge of excitement among his supporters.
With just days left until the election, the stakes are high, and the outcome remains uncertain.
Pratt’s campaign has sparked discussions about the influence of celebrity in politics and the potential for a reality TV star to become a legitimate political leader.
As both candidates prepare for the final push, the Los Angeles mayoral race is shaping up to be one of the most closely watched elections in recent history.
The implications of this election extend beyond Los Angeles, as it raises questions about the future of political leadership and the role of public figures in shaping policy.
In the coming days, voters will have the opportunity to make their voices heard and decide the future of their city.
With the election fast approaching, all eyes are on Los Angeles as the race unfolds.
As Spencer Pratt continues to gain momentum, the question remains: can a reality star truly lead a city, or will the political establishment prevail once again?
Regardless of the outcome, this election has captured the attention of the nation and may set the stage for future political dynamics in America.
The Los Angeles mayoral race serves as a reminder of the power of grassroots movements and the impact of public sentiment on the electoral process.
As the candidates make their final appeals to voters, the future of Los Angeles hangs in the balance, and the city awaits the decision of its residents.