Elon Musk had more extensive ties to Epstein than previously known - NTQ
Newly released files from DoJ show the pair making plans in 2012 and 2013 for the Tesla CEO to visit Epstein’s island
Elon Musk had more extensive – and more friendly – communications with the financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein than previously publicly known, according to documents released on Friday by the Department of Justice. Emails in the files appear to show the two cordially messaging each other on two separate occasions to make plans for Musk to visit Epstein’s island.
The documents include Musk and Epstein emailing in both 2012 and 2013 to determine when Musk should make the trip to Little St James. Neither exchanges appear to have resulted in Musk visiting the island, due to logistical issues.
“Will be in the BVI/St Bart’s area over the holidays. Is there a good time to visit?” Musk states on 13 December 2013.
“any day 1st - 8th . play it by ear if you want. always space for you,” Epstein replies.
Musk then sends several emails relaying his schedule, and the two settle on 2 January as a date for the visit. The email exchange ends with Epstein telling Musk that he would need to remain in New York and sending his regrets that they could not meet.
“Bad news- Unfortunately , my schedule will keep me in New York . I was really looking forward to finally spending some time together with just fun as the agenda. so i am very disappointed. Hopefully we can schedule another time in the near future,” Epstein wrote.
US justice department releases more than 3 million new pages of Epstein files
Read more
In November 2012, Epstein sent Musk an email asking “how many people will you be for the heli to island”.
“Probably just Talulah and me. What day/night will be the wildest party on your island?” Musk replied, in an apparent reference to his former wife Talulah Riley.
Musk followed up with an email on 25 December in response to another Epstein message that encouraged him to visit and offered use of his helicopter.
“Do you have any parties planned? I’ve been working to the edge of sanity this year and so, once my kids head home after Christmas, I really want to hit the party scene in St Barts or elsewhere and let loose. The invitation is much appreciated, but a peaceful island experience is the opposite of what I’m looking for,” Musk wrote.
“Understood , I will see you on st Barth, the ratio on my island might make Talilah uncomfortable,” Epstein responded.
“Ratio is not a problem for Talulah,” Musk said.
On 2 January 2013, Musk sent Epstein an email suggesting that the visit wouldn’t take place saying: “Logistics won’t work this time around.”
Musk has been harshly critical of those linked to Epstein, but the newly released emails appear to contradict his own longstanding denial of any ties of his own. The Tesla CEO told Vanity Fair in 2019 that Epstein was “obviously a creep” and claimed that Epstein “tried repeatedly to get me to visit his island. I declined.” The emails between the two moguls come years after Epstein was convicted in 2008 of soliciting prostitution from a minor in Florida. Authorities later arrested Epstein in 2019 on federal sex-trafficking charges.
A separate email in the documents shows Epstein’s longtime assistant Lesley Groff appearing to make plans for Epstein to have lunch at SpaceX in 2013, stating: “Elon Musk appreciates the invitation to the Ranch but has commitments… Lunch on Monday Feb.25th at 1pm at Space X is confirmed”. It is unclear whether the lunch took place or whether Musk was in attendance. Yet another series of exchanges from March 2013 features Epstein and Musk emailing back and forth after Epstein sends him congratulations a day after a SpaceX rocket launch.
A representative for Musk and his artificial intelligence company, xAI, did not immediately return a request for comment.
The newly released emails between Musk and Epstein, who was found dead in his prison cell in 2019 and for years has been the subject of speculation over his connections to some of the world’s most powerful people, are part of a tranche of 3 million documents that the justice department made public on Friday.
Musk has faced pressure to address any potential connection to Epstein in the past, including after an earlier justice department release of documents related to the investigation mentioned his name. House Democrats last year released a copy of Epstein’s daily schedule, which showed a calendar entry from 2014 that states “Reminder: Elon Musk to island Dec. 6 (is this still happening?)”. No other information was included, and Musk denied making plans for the visit in a post on X.
“This is false,” he wrote in response to a post that mentioned the allegations.
Musk has also denied knowing Epstein’s longtime co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, claiming that a much-circulated photo of the two of them together at an event was because she “photobombed” him at a Vanity Fair party. Musk stated that he once visited Epstein’s Manhattan apartment “for about 30 minutes” with his ex-wife Talulah Riley as part of research for a book she was writing, but did not specify an exact date.
While he has denied a personal connection to Epstein, Musk has invoked the sex offender’s name to attack others. He claimed during his public falling-out with Donald Trump last year that the president’s name was in the Epstein files. He later appeared to delete his posts on X accusing Trump of ties to Epstein. Musk also insulted fellow tech mogul Bill Gates in May over the Microsoft founder’s relationship with Epstein, lashing out after Gates criticized him for cuts to humanitarian aid.
“Who does Bill Gates think he is to make comments about the welfare of children given that he frequented Jeffrey Epstein?” Musk said.
An incredible self-own
In 1936, John Scott, son of the late Guardian owner and legendary editor CP Scott, did something unheard of for a media heir: he gave up his stake for the greater good.
After inheriting the newspaper, Scott renounced all financial benefit – bar his salary – in the Guardian (worth £1m at the time and around £62m today) and passed ownership over to the newly formed Scott Trust. The Trust would evolve to have one key mission: to secure the financial and editorial independence of the Guardian in perpetuity.
That means the Guardian can’t be bought. Not by private equity, not by a conglomerate, and definitely not by a billionaire looking for a political mouthpiece. So here are three good reasons to make the choice to support us today.
1. Our quality, investigative journalism is a scrutinising force at a time when the rich and powerful are getting away with more and more.
2. We are independent and have no billionaire owner controlling what we do, so your money directly powers our reporting.
3. It doesn’t cost much, and takes less time than it took to read this message.
This unique model also means we depend on readers like you from Vietnam to help fund our work. Our independence means we can say what we want, report on who we want, challenge who we want, and stand up at a time when others are sitting down. If you would rather the news you read was the result of decisions made by journalists and editors, not shareholders or ultra-wealthy tech bros, then, well, you know what to do:
Spencer Pratt SURGES POSTING VIRAL LA Animal Ad And THIS Happens As He NOW Leads Over Karen Bass FULL STORY: In a surprising twist in the Los Angeles mayoral race, reality TV star Spencer Pratt has surged ahead in the polls, challenging incumbent Mayor Karen Bass. As the election approaches, Pratt's campaign has gained momentum, resonating with voters through a viral animal welfare advertisement that highlights the plight of neglected animals in the city. This ad has sparked discussions about Bass's handling of the animal shelter crisis and homelessness in Los Angeles. With only days left until the election, Pratt's message is clear: he aims to bring about significant change by addressing these pressing issues. Meanwhile, Bass continues her campaign efforts, facing increasing pressure as the race tightens. The dynamics of this election have captured national attention, raising questions about celebrity influence in politics and the future of Los Angeles. - Trends.newsonline.biz
Spencer Pratt SURGES POSTING VIRAL LA Animal Ad And THIS Happens As He NOW Leads Over Karen Bass
In an unprecedented turn of events, the Los Angeles mayoral race has taken a dramatic twist as reality television star Spencer Pratt emerges as a serious contender against the incumbent mayor, Karen Bass.
The campaign has gained national attention, with Pratt wrapping up a media tour in New York City that has propelled him into the spotlight.
As the election date draws near, the race has become increasingly competitive, with recent polls indicating a neck-and-neck battle between Pratt and Bass.
Matt Finn, reporting from Los Angeles, highlights the tense atmosphere as both candidates ramp up their efforts to secure votes.
Karen Bass, the Democratic incumbent, has been actively campaigning, holding rallies and events to galvanize her supporters.
At a recent rally at the SEIU Union Building, Bass addressed her opponents, including Pratt, whom she referred to as a “TV reality star villain.”
Her remarks drew laughter from the crowd as she emphasized the importance of choosing a leader who truly cares for the community rather than a celebrity figure.
Bass’s campaign is focused on her experience and commitment to addressing the pressing issues facing Los Angeles, including homelessness and public safety.
However, Pratt’s campaign is gaining traction as he appeals directly to mothers and animal lovers, positioning himself as a candidate who will prioritize the needs of families and pets.
In a recent interview with Fox News, Pratt stated, “Moms are getting me elected because I’m saying, ‘Oh, as mayor, I’m going to enforce the law and make sure moms and kids can use their parks again.’”
He emphasized the need to combat illegal encampments and restore safety in neighborhoods, presenting himself as a candidate of change.
Pratt’s message resonates with voters who are frustrated with the current state of affairs in Los Angeles, particularly regarding homelessness and animal welfare.
His campaign has gained momentum thanks to a viral advertisement that highlights the plight of animals in the city’s shelters and on the streets, particularly in areas like Skid Row.
In the ad, Pratt draws a parallel between the unconditional love of dogs and the need for compassion towards all living beings, stating, “There’s a reason dog is just God backwards.”
He criticizes Bass for neglecting the animal crisis and vows to put an end to the suffering of animals in the city.
The advertisement has garnered significant attention on social media, with many praising Pratt for bringing attention to the issue of animal welfare.
As the polls tighten, Pratt’s campaign is reportedly outpacing Bass in fundraising, raising concerns for the incumbent as she intensifies her efforts to rally support.
Bass has been seen actively soliciting votes, providing instructions on how to vote and encouraging constituents to participate in the electoral process.
Amid the heightened competition, Pratt’s campaign continues to gain traction, with reports indicating that he has surpassed Bass in some polls, leading to a surge of excitement among his supporters.
With just days left until the election, the stakes are high, and the outcome remains uncertain.
Pratt’s campaign has sparked discussions about the influence of celebrity in politics and the potential for a reality TV star to become a legitimate political leader.
As both candidates prepare for the final push, the Los Angeles mayoral race is shaping up to be one of the most closely watched elections in recent history.
The implications of this election extend beyond Los Angeles, as it raises questions about the future of political leadership and the role of public figures in shaping policy.
In the coming days, voters will have the opportunity to make their voices heard and decide the future of their city.
With the election fast approaching, all eyes are on Los Angeles as the race unfolds.
As Spencer Pratt continues to gain momentum, the question remains: can a reality star truly lead a city, or will the political establishment prevail once again?
Regardless of the outcome, this election has captured the attention of the nation and may set the stage for future political dynamics in America.
The Los Angeles mayoral race serves as a reminder of the power of grassroots movements and the impact of public sentiment on the electoral process.
As the candidates make their final appeals to voters, the future of Los Angeles hangs in the balance, and the city awaits the decision of its residents.
